About Me

Name: TexasTom
Email: texas1951tom@att.net
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

Charles Krauthammer's Interview with Der Spiegel "Fabulous"!

Charles Krauthammer is clear and to the point in his interview with Der Spiegel.  The Europeans just don't get conservatives.

Go to Interview: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,656501,00.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Cap and Trade Dead" and "The Health Care Bill is the Worst I've Ever Seen"

Went to a GOP picnic on Saturday in Plano, TX. Had a lot of the local GOP office holders for county, city and state. Also, had one of our two US Representatives from our county, Congressman Sam Johnson. Sam is getting up in years but we are very lucky to have him as our representative. A little background on Sam. Sam is a retired Air Force Colonel where he flew fighter jets in the Korean and Viet Nam wars. In 1966 he was shot down over Viet Nam and was a resident of the Hanoi Hilton for 7 years of which 42 months were in solitary confinement. During this period, he was repeatedly tortured. Johnson recounted the details of his POW experience in his autobiography, Captive Warriors.

Sam spoke to us for approximately 20 minutes. The important points where that Cap and Trade appears to be dead in the senate, the House version of Health Care Reform is the worst bill he had ever seen in his 18 years in congress. He also said that Obama's use of Czars is circumventing the cabinet system and congressional approval of appointments. Under his breath he said it was getting close to being a dictatorship.

Here's a list of the Blue Dogs in the U.S. House of Representatives;
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD)
Rep. Baron Hill (IN-09)
Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03)
Rep. Heath Shuler (NC-11)
Altmire, Jason (PA-04)
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24)
Baca, Joe (CA-43)
Barrow, John (GA-12)
Berry, Marion (AR-01)
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02)
Boren, Dan (OK-02)
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03)
Boyd, Allen (FL-02)
Bright, Bobby (AL-02)
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18)
Carney, Christopher (PA-10)
Chandler, Ben (KY-06)
Childers, Travis (MS-01)
Cooper, Jim (TN-05)
Costa, Jim (CA-20)
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28)
Dahlkemper, Kathy (PA-03)
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04)
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02)
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08)
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08)
Gordon, Bart (TN-06)
Griffith, Parker (AL-05)
Harman, Jane (CA-36)
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie (SD)
Hill, Baron (IN-09)
Holden, Tim (PA-17)
Kratovil, Jr., Frank (MD-01)
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07)
Marshall, Jim (GA-03)
Matheson, Jim (UT-02)
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03)
Michaud, Mike (ME-02)
Minnick, Walt (ID-01)
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05)
Moore, Dennis (KS-03)
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08)
Nye, Glenn (VA-02)
Peterson, Collin (MN-07)
Pomeroy, Earl (ND)
Ross, Mike (AR-04)
Salazar, John (CO-03)
Sanchez, Loretta (CA-47)
Schiff, Adam (CA-29)
Scott, David (GA-13)
Shuler, Heath (NC-11)
Space, Zack (OH-18)
Tanner, John (TN-08)
Taylor, Gene (MS-04)
Thompson, Mike (CA-01)
Wilson, Charles (OH-06)

These are the ones that can be swayed when it comes to Obama's agenda. [i.e. Cap and Trade, Health Care Reform etc.]
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Carbongate

I am posting the complete article from the Investor's Business Daily below because I believe that it is very important for all to read. To radically transform our economy and way of life to effect the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere when 2% of the atmosphere is made up of all greenhouse gases and 3.6% of Greenhouse gases areCO2 and only 3.4% of the CO2 comes from human activity is unbelievable and irresponsible.[We're talking about 0.0024% of the atmosphere] Talk about an inconvenient truth.

Carbongate

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, June 26, 2009 4:20 PM PT

Climate Change: A suppressed EPA study says old U.N. data ignore the decline in global temperatures and other inconvenient truths. Was the report kept under wraps to influence the vote on the cap-and-trade bill?

This was supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Yet as the House of Representatives prepared to vote on the Waxman-Markey bill, the largest tax increase in U.S. history on 100% of Americans, an attempt was made to suppress a study shredding supporters' arguments.

On Friday, the day of the vote, the Competitive Enterprise Institute said it was releasing "an internal study on climate science which was suppressed by the Environmental Protection Agency."

In the release, the institute's Richard Morrison said "internal EPA e-mail messages, released by CEI earlier in the week, indicate that the report was kept under wraps and its author silenced because of pressure to support the administration's agenda of regulating carbon dioxide."

Reading the report, available on the CEI Web site, we find this "endangerment analysis" contains such interesting items as: "Given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based on a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data."

What the report says is that the EPA, by adopting the United Nations' 2007 "Fourth Assessment" report, is relying on outdated research by its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The research, it says, is "at best three years out of date in a rapidly changing field" and ignores the latest scientific findings.

Besides noting the decline in temperatures as CO2 levels have increased, the draft report says the "consensus" on storm frequency and intensity is now "much more neutral."

Then there's one of Al Gore's grim fairy tales — the melting of the Greenland ice sheet and glaciers the size of Tennessee roaming the North Atlantic. "The idea that warming temperatures will cause Greenland to rapidly shed its ice has been greatly diminished by new results indicating little evidence for operations of such processes," the report says.

Little evidence? Outdated U.N. research? No reason to rush? This is not what the Obama administration and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi were telling us when they were rushing to force a Friday vote on Waxman-Markey. We were given the impression that unless we passed this cap-and-tax fiasco, polar bears would be extinct by the Fourth of July.

We have noted frequently the significance of solar activity on earth's climate and history. This EPA draft report not only confirms our reporting but the brazen incompetence of those "experts" that have been prophesying planetary apocalypse.

"A new 2009 paper by Scafetta and West," the report says, "suggests that the IPCC used faulty solar data in dismissing the direct effect of solar variability on global temperatures. Their report suggests that solar variability could account for up to 68% of the increase in Earth's global temperatures."

The report was the product of Alan Carlin, senior operations research analyst at the EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE). He's been with the EPA for 38 years but now has been taken off all climate-related work. He is convinced that actual climate observations do not match climate change theories and that only the politics, not the science, has been settled.

Thomas Fuller, environmental policy blogger with the San Francisco Examiner, wrote Thursday in a story developed in conjunction with Anthony Watts' Web site wattsupwiththat.com: "A source inside the Environmental Protection Agency confirmed many of the claims made by analyst Alan Carlin, the economist/physicist who yesterday went public with accusations that science was being ignored in evaluating the danger of CO2."

All this is particularly interesting because of the charges by Al Gore, NASA's James Hansen and others that the Bush administration and energy companies actively suppressed the truth about climate change.

One of the e-mails unearthed by CEI was dated March 12, from Al McGartland, office director at NCEE, forbidding Carlin from speaking to anyone outside NCEE on endangerment issues such as those in his suppressed report.

Carlin replied on March 16, requesting that his study be forwarded to EPA's Office of Air and Radiation, which directs EPA's climate change program. Carlin points out the peer-reviewed references in his study and points out that the new studies "explain much of the observational data that have been collected which cannot be explained by the IPCC models."

For saying the climate change emperors had no clothes, Carlin was told March 17: "The administrator and the administration have decided to move forward on endangerment, and your comments do not help the legal or policy case for this decision. . . . I can only see one impact of your comments given where we are in the process, and that would be a very negative impact on our office."

In other words, the administration and Congress had their collective minds made up and didn't want to be confused with the facts. They certainly didn't want any inconvenient truths coming out of their own Environmental Protection Agency, the one that wants to regulate everything from your lawn mower to bovine emissions and which says the product of your respiration and ours, carbon dioxide, is a dangerous pollutant and not the basis for all life on earth.

The problem the warm-mongers have is they now are in a position of telling the American people, who are you going to believe — us or your own lying eyes? Forget the snow in Malibu, the record cold winters. Forget that temperatures have dropped for a decade.

In April, President Obama declared that "the days of science taking a back seat to ideology are over." Apparently not, for as he spoke those very words his administration was suppressing science to advance a very pernicious ideology.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rollback Congress/Senate Pay

The probability that we could pull this off is close to zero, but it would be a huge step toward the American People taking control of a run-a-way legislature. If we could tie their salaries to a median middle class rate and they would only receive a cost of living raise or cut when that median changes, both up and down. That just might make those jerks think when they pass taxes or crap and trade legislation. Also, all government workers, legislators too should be subject to all of the taxes and fees all of us are subject to. Like Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, State income tax and on and on. We have created an elite class and now we are paying for it.

Here's a little stats on what we pay these jerks. This doesn't include the moneys paid to support their offices;
* The current salary (2009) for rank-and-file members of the House and Senate is $174,000 per year.

* During the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin considered proposing that elected government officials not be paid for their service. Other Founding Fathers, however, decided otherwise.

* From 1789 to 1855, members of Congress received only a per diem (daily payment) of $6.00 while in session, except for a period from December 1815 to March 1817, when they received $1,500 a year. Members began receiving an annual salary in 1855, when they were paid $3,000 per year.

* Congress: Leadership Members' Salary (2009)
Leaders of the House and Senate are paid a higher salary than rank-and-file members.

* Senate Leadership
Majority Party Leader - $193,400
Minority Party Leader - $193,400

* House Leadership
Speaker of the House - $223,500
Majority Leader - $193,400
Minority Leader - $193,400

Oh yeah, they just got a cost of living increase in January of $4,900/year. That's 2.9% increase for the rank and file. I wonder how many have refused or returned that increase now that we are near 10% unemployment?

Next initiative should be term limits.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US wants to paint the world white to save energy?

What Idiots!

LONDON(AFP) (AFP) - US Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Tuesday the Obama administration wanted to paint roofs an energy-reflecting white, as he took part in a climate change symposium in London.

The Nobel laureate in physics called for a "new revolution" in energy generation to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

But he warned there was no silver bullet for tackling climate change, and said a range of measures should be introduced, including painting flat roofs white.

Making roads and roofs a paler colour could have the equivalent effect of taking every car in the world off the road for 11 years, Chu said.

It was a geo-engineering scheme that was "completely benign" and would keep buildings cooler and reduce energy use from air conditioning, as well as reflecting sunlight back away from the Earth.

For people who found white hard on the eye, scientists had also developed "cool colours" which looked to the human eye like normal ones, but reflect heat like pale colours even if they are darker shades.

And painting cars in cool or light colours could deliver considerable savings on energy use for air conditioning units, he said.

Speaking at the start of a symposium on climate change hosted by the Prince of Wales and attended by more than 20 Nobel laureates, Chu said fresh thinking was required to cut the amount of carbon created by power generation.

He said: "The industrial revolution was a revolution in the use of energy. It offloaded from human and animal power into using fossil fuels.

"We have to go to a different new revolution that can severely decrease the amount of carbon emissions in the generation of energy."
Tags: Climate   chu  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama and Abbas agree that Israel should stop building Settlements on Palestinian Land?

WHAT PALESTINIAN LAND? There has never been a Palestinian State. Palestinians can and are Israelis citizens. I don't get it. Obama may trust Mahmoud Abbas, [Abu Mazen his terrorist name] but we shouldn't.

I don't blame Israel and would not deal with these Palestinians until they recognize Israel's right to exist period end of sentence. No talks are necessary until this is done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

George Will's Latest op-ed is a must Read

Surprised I'm not pushing another Krauthammer editorial? Me too. Maybe I'm becoming a Washington Post homey. Not!

I'll give you a taste of the editorial. Here's how it starts out;
By George F. Will
Thursday, May 14, 2009

"Anyone, said T.S. Eliot, could carve a goose, were it not for the bones. And anyone could govern as boldly as his whims decreed, were it not for the skeletal structure that keeps civil society civil -- the rule of law. The Obama administration is bold. It also is careless regarding constitutional values and is acquiring a tincture of lawlessness".

Great start and it gets better. "the Obama administration has told California that unless the $74 million in cuts are rescinded, it will deny the state $6.8 billion in stimulus money". Talk about Gestapo tactics.

Give it a read. I think you will get a lot out of it. I did. Tincture of Lawlessness
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Photo says it all - SovereignStates.net

http://api.ning.com/files/isdhQUSeSC7mV9ePQV-XaJatxEFsJTH5l*6DE5HEP9jdgLRBOxXPl*btV7NHgmAB5girpSNcPFV9*r8-*vXEgfIfqszCiLHx/txflag.jpg

Gee I really love my state.
Very informative website too! http://sovereignstates.net/

Email, write, call or all three your State Representatives. This is one way we can put pressure on Washington.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kaurthammer clears up the Torture Issue, for Me anyway.

Once again Charles Kaurthammer has hit the nail on the head in his latest editorial "Torture? No. Except.." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/30/AR2009043003108.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

I wish we could say we never ever will use torture, but in a world that includes such evil as the Radical Islamists who routinely cut off hands and heads or stone women for walking outside with an ankle showing, it doesn't make any sense to me not to do whatever it takes to protect ourselves and innocent people who could be effected by these evil enemies. While I don't think of waterboarding is torture it is a politically correct definition. It is a very moderate form of interrogation when compared to the methods of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan or methods used currently around the world routinely for police interrogations. I know that doesn't make it right to water board everyone for any reason, but aren't the levels of aggressive interrogation techniques just as there is levels of crime, evil, or sin? I think so. I have no problem with saying we won't go past a certain point. Say, "We will never use electroshock" or "We will never severe appendages". But to say we will never ever under any circumstance use any kind of aggressive methods to obtain information is to say the least suicidal.

Read Kaurthammer's editorial and let me know what you think,

Texas Tom
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Common Sense Texas Style

As you all might know, Common Sense was a pamphlet written by Thomas Paine. Common Sense presented the American colonists with an argument for independence from British rule at a time when the question of independence was still undecided. This blog will attempt to present arguments for a smaller more responsive government at a time I believe this approach is not being embraced.

I am depending upon the readers of this blog for their responses and suggestions on topics and to keep me on tract.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Texas Style

I wanted to start out demonstrating what I mean about the Texas Style and thought of a common saying we have here in Texas.

"A Texan considers it poor manners to ask a person where they are from. If they are from Texas, wait a minute, they will let you know and if they are not from Texas, why embarrass them."

Texans are generally hard working, god fearing and generous people. People from outside often see us as boastful and over the top, but this truly is the exception. We do tend to be outspoken and speak our mind, but generally a Texan will listen to the point they feel compelled to speak out.

That is exactly what I am going to do now, Speak out.
Tags: Texans  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Texas Declaration of Independence

The Unanimous Declaration of Independence
made by the
Delegates of the People of Texas
in General Convention
at the town of Washington

on the 2nd day of March 1836.

When a government has ceased to protect the lives, liberty and property of the people, from whom its legitimate powers are derived, and for the advancement of whose happiness it was instituted, and so far from being a guarantee for the enjoyment of those inestimable and inalienable rights, becomes an instrument in the hands of evil rulers for their oppression.

When the Federal Republican Constitution of their country, which they have sworn to support, no longer has a substantial existence, and the whole nature of their government has been forcibly changed, without their consent, from a restricted federative republic, composed of sovereign states, to a consolidated central military despotism, in which every interest is disregarded but that of the army and the priesthood, both the eternal enemies of civil liberty, the everready minions of power, and the usual instruments of tyrants.

When, long after the spirit of the constitution has departed, moderation is at length so far lost by those in power, that even the semblance of freedom is removed, and the forms themselves of the constitution discontinued, and so far from their petitions and remonstrances being regarded, the agents who bear them are thrown into dungeons, and mercenary armies sent forth to force a new government upon them at the point of the bayonet.

When, in consequence of such acts of malfeasance and abdication on the part of the government, anarchy prevails, and civil society is dissolved into its original elements. In such a crisis, the first law of nature, the right of self-preservation, the inherent and inalienable rights of the people to appeal to first principles, and take their political affairs into their own hands in extreme cases, enjoins it as a right towards themselves, and a sacred obligation to their posterity, to abolish such government, and create another in its stead, calculated to rescue them from impending dangers, and to secure their future welfare and happiness.

Nations, as well as individuals, are amenable for their acts to the public opinion of mankind. A statement of a part of our grievances is therefore submitted to an impartial world, in justification of the hazardous but unavoidable step now taken, of severing our political connection with the Mexican people, and assuming an independent attitude among the nations of the earth.

The Mexican government, by its colonization laws, invited and induced the Anglo-American population of Texas to colonize its wilderness under the pledged faith of a written constitution, that they should continue to enjoy that constitutional liberty and republican government to which they had been habituated in the land of their birth, the United States of America.

In this expectation they have been cruelly disappointed, inasmuch as the Mexican nation has acquiesced in the late changes made in the government by General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, who having overturned the constitution of his country, now offers us the cruel alternative, either to abandon our homes, acquired by so many privations, or submit to the most intolerable of all tyranny, the combined despotism of the sword and the priesthood.

It has sacrificed our welfare to the state of Coahuila, by which our interests have been continually depressed through a jealous and partial course of legislation, carried on at a far distant seat of government, by a hostile majority, in an unknown tongue, and this too, notwithstanding we have petitioned in the humblest terms for the establishment of a separate state government, and have, in accordance with the provisions of the national constitution, presented to the general Congress a republican constitution, which was, without just cause, contemptuously rejected.

It incarcerated in a dungeon, for a long time, one of our citizens, for no other cause but a zealous endeavor to procure the acceptance of our constitution, and the establishment of a state government.

It has failed and refused to secure, on a firm basis, the right of trial by jury, that palladium of civil liberty, and only safe guarantee for the life, liberty, and property of the citizen.

It has failed to establish any public system of education, although possessed of almost boundless resources, (the public domain,) and although it is an axiom in political science, that unless a people are educated and enlightened, it is idle to expect the continuance of civil liberty, or the capacity for self government.

It has suffered the military commandants, stationed among us, to exercise arbitrary acts of oppression and tyrrany, thus trampling upon the most sacred rights of the citizens, and rendering the military superior to the civil power.

It has dissolved, by force of arms, the state Congress of Coahuila and Texas, and obliged our representatives to fly for their lives from the seat of government, thus depriving us of the fundamental political right of representation.

It has demanded the surrender of a number of our citizens, and ordered military detachments to seize and carry them into the Interior for trial, in contempt of the civil authorities, and in defiance of the laws and the constitution.

It has made piratical attacks upon our commerce, by commissioning foreign desperadoes, and authorizing them to seize our vessels, and convey the property of our citizens to far distant ports for confiscation.

It denies us the right of worshipping the Almighty according to the dictates of our own conscience, by the support of a national religion, calculated to promote the temporal interest of its human functionaries, rather than the glory of the true and living God.

It has demanded us to deliver up our arms, which are essential to our defence, the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.

It has invaded our country both by sea and by land, with intent to lay waste our territory, and drive us from our homes; and has now a large mercenary army advancing, to carry on against us a war of extermination.

It has, through its emissaries, incited the merciless savage, with the tomahawk and scalping knife, to massacre the inhabitants of our defenseless frontiers.

It hath been, during the whole time of our connection with it, the contemptible sport and victim of successive military revolutions, and hath continually exhibited every characteristic of a weak, corrupt, and tyrranical government.

These, and other grievances, were patiently borne by the people of Texas, untill they reached that point at which forbearance ceases to be a virtue. We then took up arms in defence of the national constitution. We appealed to our Mexican brethren for assistance. Our appeal has been made in vain. Though months have elapsed, no sympathetic response has yet been heard from the Interior. We are, therefore, forced to the melancholy conclusion, that the Mexican people have acquiesced in the destruction of their liberty, and the substitution therfor of a military government; that they are unfit to be free, and incapable of self government.

The necessity of self-preservation, therefore, now decrees our eternal political separation.

We, therefore, the delegates with plenary powers of the people of Texas, in solemn convention assembled, appealing to a candid world for the necessities of our condition, do hereby resolve and declare, that our political connection with the Mexican nation has forever ended, and that the people of Texas do now constitute a free, Sovereign, and independent republic, and are fully invested with all the rights and attributes which properly belong to independent nations; and, conscious of the rectitude of our intentions, we fearlessly and confidently commit the issue to the decision of the Supreme arbiter of the destinies of nations.

Tags: Texas  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberty versus Equality

Liberty, individual liberty is an American ideal. The founders made it the centerpiece of the Declaration of Independence and it was made the underlying basis of our Constitution in the Preamble and the Bill of Rights. Declaration: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Were there ever any greater words written? You notice that when the Declaration of Independence gets to the unalienable rights, equality isn't there. For me the one word that describes what the United States is all about, is "Liberty" and primarily "individual liberty". Did Patrick Henry say, "Give me Equality or give me death"? No, it was "LIBERTY".

Equality in the sense I'm using here is a European ideal as in France "Liberté, égalité, fraternité". This is not to be confused with "Equal Opportunity" or "Equal protection under the Law, which we have in our society. The American concepts of equality strengthen individual liberty. The concept of Equality I'm using here is more closely related to equal outcomes or cultural, economic and social equality which are left wing concepts of equality. It's more a Western European Left idea than the Soviet/Communists or Nazi/Fascist left idea. [Yes, Fascist are Left, the main difference is International vs national socialism we can argue this later.]

We are seeing these Western European concepts of equality creep into our government more and more. It's nothing new, but lately the left in the U.S. is attempting to "transform", Obama's words, our beloved country into a Western European style country. Think "FRANCE",UGH! Hence we get more redistribution of wealth, more social welfare, cradle to the grave and class warfare. Yeah I know it doesn't work, but hey our left is so much more intelligent than the left of the past.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kaurthammer clears up the Torture Issue, for Me anyway.

Once again Charles Kaurthammer has hit the nail on the head in his latest editorial  "Torture? No. Except..." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/30/AR2009043003108.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

I wish we could say we never ever will use torture, but in a world that includes such evil as the Radical Islamists who routinely cut off hands and heads or stone women for walking outside with an ankle showing, it doesn't make any sense to me not to do whatever it takes to protect ourselves and innocent people who could be effected by these evil enemies. While I don't think of waterboarding is torture it is a politically correct definition. It is a very moderate form of interrogation when compared to the methods of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan or methods used currently around the world routinely for police interrogations. I know that doesn't make it right to water board everyone for any reason, but aren't the levels of aggressive interrogation techniques just as there is levels of crime, evil, or sin? I think so. I have no problem with saying we won't go past a certain point. Say, "We will never use electroshock" or "We will never severe appendages". But to say we will never ever under any circumstance use any kind of aggressive methods to obtain information is to say the least suicidal.

Read Kaurthammer's editorial and let me know what you think,

Texas Tom
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »